RAYSLIGHTS.BS (2009)
<![CDATA[
<body><script type="text/javascript">
function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) {
if(window.addEventListener) {
window.addEventListener('load',
function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false);
} else {
window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; });
}
}
</script>
<div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() {
if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) {
gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({
url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/19208898?origin\x3dhttp://rayslights.blogspot.com',
where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"),
id: "navbar-iframe"
});
}
});
</script>
]]>
I just woke up not long ago, went to see the papers and saw something so familiar. Those dunmanites who have today's straits times should take a look at the home section page 6. The whole page was talking about the new dunman logo. The tittle attracted me to read it: Dunman alumni oppose new logo. Then there was the two logos for comparison. I guessed mrs neo was quite sad actually when some many ex-students keep shooting the new logo. I also not quite like the new logo, it was quite childish, more like a primary school logo. The old logo looks more prestigious, lucky I graduate one year earlier, otherwise I would have to accommodate with the new logo. Then mrs neo told the papers that she will use a chance to explain to the alumni.
I thought this issue was quite minor, it started with a petition online then there was a powerpoint slide circulated among alumni. I did not expect it will turn out in the papers, a bit too over. First time you see students' protesting till the papers report about it.
Damn it, Arsenal drawed with Tottenham 4-4, Arsenal was super unlucky. Going off to school soon, till 6pm today, freaking long hours. The jcs are taking their a levels chinese today, GOODLUCK GUYS!
9:59 AM
